SEQUENCE OF TENSES

  When two verbs depend on each other their tenses must have a definite relation to each other. "I shall have much pleasure in accepting your kind invitation" is wrong, unless you really mean that just now you decline though by-and-by you intend to accept? or unless you mean that you do accept now, though you have no pleasure in doing so, but look forward to be more pleased by-and-by. In fact the sequence of the compound tenses puzzle experienced writers. The best plan is to go back in thought to the time in question and use the tense you would then naturally use. Now in the sentence "I should have liked to have gone to see the circus" the way to find out the proper sequence is to ask yourself the question— what is it I "should have liked" to do? and the plain answer is "to go to see the circus." I cannot answer—"To have gone to see the circus" for that would imply that at a certain moment I would have liked to be in the position of having gone to the circus. But I do not mean this? I mean that at the moment at which I am speaking I wish I had gone to see the circus. The verbal phrase I should have liked carries me back to the time when there was a chance of seeing the circus and once back at the time, the going to the circus is a thing of the present. This whole explanation resolves itself into the simple question,—what should I have liked at that time, and the answer is"to go to see the circus," therefore this is the proper sequence, and the expression should be "I should have liked to go to see the circus."

  本章節來源於𝕓𝕒𝕟𝕩𝕚𝕒𝕓𝕒.𝕔𝕠𝕞

  If we wish to speak of something relating to a time prior to that indicated in the past tense we must use the perfect tense of the infinitive? as, "He appeared to have seen better days." We should say "I expected to meet him," not "I expected to have met him." "We intended to visit you," not "to have visited you." "I hoped they would arrive," not "I hoped they would have arrived." "I thought I should catch the bird," not "I thought I should have caught the bird." "I had intended to go to the meeting," not "I had intended to have gone to the meeting."

  BETWEEN—AMONG

  These prepositions are often carelessly interchanged. Between has reference to two objects only, among to more than two. "The money was equally divided between them" is right when there are only two, but if there are more than two it should be "the money was equally divided among them."

  LESS—FEWER

  Less refers is quantity, fewer to number. "No man has less virtues" should be"No man has fewer virtues." "The farmer had some oats and a fewer quantity of wheat" should be "the farmer had some oats and a less quantity of wheat."

  FURTHER—FARTHER

  Further is commonly used to denote quantity, farther to denote distance. "I have walked farther than you," "I need no further supply" are correct.

  EACH OTHER—ONE ANOTHER

  Each other refers to two, one another to more than two. "Jones and Smith quarreled? they struck each other" is correct. "Jones, Smith and Brown quarreled? they struck one another" is also correct. Don't say, "The two boys teach one another" nor "The three girls love each other."

  EACH, EVERY, EITHER, NEITHER

  These words are continually misapplied. Each can be applied to two or any higher number of objects to signify every one of the number independently. Every requires more than two to be spoken of and denotes all the persons or things taken separately. Either denotes one or the other of two, and should not be used to include both. Neither is the negative of either, denoting not the other, and not the one, and relating to two persons or things considered separately.

  The following examples illustrate the correct usage of these words:

  Each man of the crew received a reward.

  Every man in the regiment displayed bravery.

  We can walk on either side of the street.

  Neither of the two is to blame.

  NEITHER-NOR

  When two singular subjects are connected by neither, nor use a singular verb? as, Neither John nor James was there," not were there.

  NONE

  Custom has sanctioned the use of this word both with a singular and plural? as—"None is so blind as he who will not see" and "None are so blind as they who will not see." However, as it is a contraction of no one it is better to use the singular verb.

  RISE-RAISE

  These verbs are very often confounded. Rise is to move or pass upward in any manner? as to "rise from bed?" to increase in value, to improve in position or rank,as "stocks rise?" "politicians rise?" "they have risen to honor."

  Raise is to lift up, to exalt, to enhance, as "I raise the table?" "He raised his servant?" "The baker raised the price of bread."

  LAY-LIE

  The transitive verb lay, and lay, the past tense of the neuter verb lie, are often confounded, though quite different in meaning. The neuter verb to lie, meaning to lie down or rest, cannot take the objective after it except with a preposition. We can say "He lies on the ground," but we cannot say "He lies the ground," since the verb is neuter and intransitive and, as such, cannot have a direct object. With lay it is different. Lay is a transitive verb, therefore it takes a direct object after it? as "I lay a wager," "I laid the carpet," etc.

  Of a carpet or any inanimate subject we should say, "It lies on the floor," "A knife lies on the table," not lays. But of a person we say—"He lays the knife on the table," not "He lies——." Lay being the past tense of the neuter to lie (down) we should say, "He lay on the bed," and lain being its past participle we must also say "He has lain on the bed."

  We can say "I lay myself down." "He laid himself down" and such expressions.

  It is imperative to remember in using these verbs that to lay means to do something, and to lie means to be in a state of rest.

  SAYS I—I SAID

  "Says I" is a vulgarism? don't use it. "I said" is correct form.

  IN—INTO

  Be careful to distinguish the meaning of these two little prepositions and don't interchange them. Don't say "He went in the room" nor "My brother is into the navy." In denotes the place where a person or thing, whether at rest or in motion, is present? and into denotes entrance. "He went into the room?" "My brother is in the navy" are correct.

  EAT—ATE

  Don't confound the two. Eat is present, ate is past. "I eat the bread" means that I am continuing the eating? "I ate the bread" means that the act of eating is past. Eaten is the perfect participle, but often eat is used instead, and as it has the same pronunciation (et) of ate, care should be taken to distinguish the past tense, I ate from the perfect I have eaten (eat).